Thursday, March 02, 2006

ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ

This redistricting cases are so interesting. I think the constitutional implications to drawing this district are . . . . zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz.

5 Comments:

At 8:07 PM, Blogger Cassandra said...

Now we know why they don't want TV cameras in the courtroom.

 
At 5:10 AM, Blogger camojack said...

Maybe she's narcoleptic...

 
At 12:54 PM, Blogger spd rdr said...

Question: Can Justice Buzzy take part in the opinion?

 
At 3:47 PM, Blogger tee bee said...

Don Surber posted about this too, with the Fox "artist's rendering." I couldn't take it seriously in an article, but that cartoon. Man, it has me on fire.

That's a cartoon joke. But seriously, can SCOTUS justices be impeached?

Why is no one asking about her competency?

Rhenquist never fell asleep; the man practically stopped breathing at the Supreme Court. And if he had dozed off, the MSM would have been all over him.

 
At 12:04 AM, Blogger camojack said...

It's that "glass ceiling", right?

 

Post a Comment

<< Home